4.5 Article

Temperature Independent Damage Detection in Plates Using Redundant Signal Measurements

期刊

JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 106-116

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-011-0096-6

关键词

Lamb waves; Mode conversion; Piezoelectric transducers; Baseline free

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under the Ministry of Education, Science Technology [M20703000015-07N0300-01510, 2009-0083489]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a method to detect notch like damages in plates using piezoelectric transducers. The method does not use prior baseline data for damage detection. A single pair of piezoelectric wafer transducers made of Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) is attached back to back on the opposite sides of a plate and are used for simultaneous actuation and sensing. A notch, which is a sudden change in thickness of the plate, leads to mode conversion of Lamb waves. The mode converted wave component in the measured signal is then separated from the other Lamb wave mode components using polarization characteristics of the piezoelectric wafer transducers. The damage index is a function of the amplitude of this mode converted component of the signal. In real world situations, the damage index will not be exactly zero due to inaccuracy in transducer collocation and non-uniformity in their bonding conditions. Therefore, a (non-zero) threshold for the damage index needs to be established to avoid false alarms. True to the spirit of baseline-free damage detection, this threshold is computed from the signals acquired only from the current state of the structure. This is achieved by using redundancy in signal measurements. Since the method detects damages without having to rely on baseline data, environmental variations like temperature change do not affect its performance. Results from numerical simulations as well as experiments on aluminum specimens are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method described above.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据