4.7 Review

The structure of opal-CT revisited

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 68-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.08.052

关键词

Opals; Tridymite; Cristobalite; Raman spectroscopy; Infrared spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a conflict of evidence with regard to the structure of the silica polymorph known as opal-CT. The current widely accepted interpretation of the structure views opal-CT as made up essentially of a disordered interlayering of crystalline cristobalitic and tridymitic stacking units, in about equal proportions where the d spacing of the diffraction maximum is close to 4.11 angstrom, but becoming progressively more ordered and cristobalitic as this spacing decreases in value and approaches the d((101)) reflection at 4.04 angstrom of alpha-cristobalite. The most compelling evidence for this interpretation comes from matching calculated and experimental XRD profiles, HRTEM lattice images and SPED patterns. This interpretation is here described as the crystalline model. However, the crystalline model is not supported by a variety of spectroscopic techniques that can be used to probe both long-range and short-range order. In general, these techniques which include FTIR, Raman, NMR and XANES spectroscopies are more consistent with a structure, especially where the diffraction maximum approaches 4.11 angstrom, as being dominated by disordered material similar to amorphous opal (opal-A) but containing a small volume of crystalline stacking units which are mainly (sometimes exclusively) of a tridyrnitic nature. This interpretation is referred to as the paracrystalline model. From a critical review of the literature, suggestions are made as to how these two conflicting strands of evidence can be reconciled, as well as matters concerning appropriate nomenclature of opaline materials. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据