4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Deformation and cracking behavior of glasses indented with diamond tips of various sharpness

期刊

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
卷 358, 期 24, 页码 3445-3452

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.01.052

关键词

Indentation; Deformation; Cracking; Glass

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The indentation response of glasses is termed normal, anomalous, or in some cases intermediate depending on the deformation mechanism and cracking response of the glass. A typical normal glass, e.g. soda-lime silicate, deforms to a large extent by a shearing mechanism and forms median/radial and lateral cracks when indented with a Vickers tip. A typical anomalous glass, e.g. fused silica, deforms primarily by densification and has a high tendency to form ring/cone cracks that can accompany median/radial and lateral cracks when indented with a Vickers tip. Intermediate glass types take on some characteristics of both normal and anomalous behavior when indented with a Vickers tip. These intermediate glasses deform with more densification and less shear than normal glasses, but do not form the ring/cone cracks typical of anomalous glasses. Glasses with this intermediate behavior require high loads to initiate crack systems originating in subsurface, i.e. median/radial and lateral cracks. It is demonstrated that the deformation and cracking response of glasses is dependent on both glass structure and contact geometry. As contacts become sharper the deformation mechanism transitions toward plastic deformation, i.e. shear, for all glass types. On the other hand, blunter contacts promote greater densification. The transition from normal to anomalous deformation and cracking behavior is shown for each glass type by indenting with a series of four-sided pyramidal indenter tips with angles of 100 degrees, 110 degrees, 120 degrees, 136 degrees (Vickers), 150 degrees, 160 degrees, and 170 degrees. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据