4.1 Article

Regional brain distribution of translocator protein using [11C]DPA-713 PET in individuals infected with HIV

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 219-232

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13365-014-0239-5

关键词

NeuroAIDS; HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder; Translocator protein; Neuroinflammation; Microglia; Molecular neuroimaging

资金

  1. Lupus Foundation of America
  2. NFL Charities
  3. [NIH 5R21MH082277]
  4. [NIH 5R01MH092443]
  5. [NIH R01EB012547]
  6. [NIH 5T32EB006351]
  7. [NIEHS ES007062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging the brain distribution of translocator protein (TSPO), a putative biomarker for glial cell activation and neuroinflammation, may inform management of individuals infected with HIV by uncovering regional abnormalities related to neurocognitive deficits and enable non-invasive therapeutic monitoring. Using the second-generation TSPO-targeted radiotracer, [C-11]DPA-713, we conducted a positron emission tomography (PET) study to compare the brains of 12 healthy human subjects to those of 23 individuals with HIV who were effectively treated with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Compared to PET data from age-matched healthy control subjects, [C-11]DPA-713 PET of individuals infected with HIV demonstrated significantly higher volume-of-distribution (V-T) ratios in white matter, cingulate cortex, and supramarginal gyrus, relative to overall gray matter V-T, suggesting localized glial cell activation in susceptible regions. Regional TSPO abnormalities were evident within a sub-cohort of neuro-asymptomatic HIV subjects, and an increase in the V-T ratio within frontal cortex was specifically linked to individuals affected with HIV-associated dementia. These findings were enabled by employing a gray matter normalization approach for PET data quantification, which improved test-retest reproducibility, intra-class correlation within the healthy control cohort, and sensitivity of uncovering abnormal regional findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据