4.5 Article

Cerebrovascular Responses to Orthostatic Stress after Spinal Cord Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 29, 期 15, 页码 2446-2456

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2379

关键词

cardiovascular control; cerebral blood flow; orthostatic hypotension; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Heart and Stroke Foundation of British Columbia and Yukon
  2. Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation
  3. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a debilitating condition affecting individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) that may be associated with cerebral hypoperfusion. We studied orthostatic cerebral control in individuals with SCI with different levels and severities of injury to spinal cardiovascular autonomic pathways. We measured beat-to-beat cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to passive orthostatic stress in 16 controls and 26 subjects with chronic SCI. Cerebrovascular control was assessed from diastolic cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFVD), and indices of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Severity of autonomic injury was inferred from spectral analyses of systolic arterial pressure, and supine plasma noradrenaline concentrations. Symptoms of OH were evaluated using questionnaires. CBFVD decreased during orthostasis only in individuals with autonomically complete injuries above T6. Orthostatic CBFVD was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with the severity of autonomic injury. Individuals with injuries above T6 had impaired dynamic autoregulation (p < 0.05) compared to controls, and this was correlated (p < 0.05) with the severity of autonomic injury. Individuals with autonomically complete SCI reported increased severity of symptoms relative to controls (p < 0.05). Symptom severity was correlated with the efficacy of dynamic autoregulation. During orthostatic stress, SCI individuals have impaired cerebrovascular control that is related to the level and severity of autonomic injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据