4.5 Article

Targeting cell death in vivo in experimental traumatic brain injury by a novel molecular probe

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 569-580

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2007.0341

关键词

animal studies; apoptosis; molecular imaging; neuronal cell death; traumatic brain injury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a frequent and major challenge in neurological and neurosurgical practice. Apoptosis may play a role in cerebral tissue damage induced by the traumatic insult, and thus its detection and inhibition may advance patient care. DDC (N, N'-didansyl-L-cystine) is a novel fluorescent probe for detection of apoptotic cells. We now report on the performance of DDC in experimental TBI. Closed head injury was induced in mice by weight-drop. DDC was administered intravenously in vivo. Two hours later, animals were sacrificed, and brain tissue was subjected to fluorescent microcopy, for assessment of DDC uptake, in correlation with histopathological assessment of apoptosis by TUNEL and caspase substrates, and also in correlation with the neurological deficits, as assessed by Neurological Severity Score (NSS). Selective uptake of DDC was observed at the primary site of injury, and also at remote sites. Uptake was at the cellular level, with accumulation of DDC in the cytoplasm. Cells manifesting DDC uptake were confirmed as apoptotic cells by detection of the characteristic apoptotic DNA fragmentation (positive TUNEL staining) and detection of activated caspases. The damaged region stained by DDC fluorescence correlated with the severity of neuronal deficits. Our study confirms the role of apoptosis in TBI, and proposes DDC as a useful tool for its selective targeting and detection in vivo. Such imaging of apoptosis, following future radiolabeling of DDC, may advance care for patients with head injury, by allowing real-time evaluation of the extent of tissue damage, assessment of novel therapeutic strategies, and optimization of treatment for the individual patient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据