4.6 Article

High-resolution QSM for functional and structural depiction of subthalamic nuclei in DBS presurgical mapping

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 131, 期 2, 页码 360-367

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2018.3.JNS172145

关键词

subthalamic nucleus; iron; deep brain stimulation; quantitative susceptibility mapping; electrode placement; functional neurosurgery; surgical technique

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01CA178007, R21EB024366, R01NS090464, R01NS095562, S10OD021782]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE Faithful depiction of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is critical for planning deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been shown to be superior to traditional T2-weighted spin echo imaging (T2w). The aim of the study was to describe submillimeter QSM for preoperative imaging of the STN in planning of DBS. METHODS Seven healthy volunteers were included in this study. T2w and QSM were obtained for all healthy volunteers, and images of different resolutions were reconstructed. Image quality and visibility of STN anatomical features were analyzed by a radiologist using a 5-point scale, and contrast properties of the STN and surrounding tissue were calculated. Additionally, data from 10 retrospectively and randomly selected PD patients who underwent 3-T MRI for DBS were analyzed for STN size and susceptibility gradient measurements. RESULTS Higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were observed in both high-resolution and low-resolution QSM images. Inter-resolution comparison demonstrated improvement in CNR for QSM, but not for T2w images. QSM provided higher inter-quadrant contrast ratios (CR) within the STN, and depicted a gradient in the distribution of susceptibility sources not visible in T2w images. CONCLUSIONS For 3-T MRI, submillimeter QSM provides accurate delineation of the functional and anatomical STN features for DBS targeting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据