4.6 Article

Long-term outcomes for low-grade intracranial ganglioglioma: 30-year experience from the Mayo Clinic Clinical article

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 117, 期 5, 页码 825-830

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2012.7.JNS111260

关键词

low-grade glioma; pediatric; ganglioglioma; glioma; WHO Grade I tumor; progression-free survival; oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. Gangliogliomas comprise less than 1% of all brain tumors and occur most often in children. Therefore, there are a limited number of patients and data involving the use or role of adjuvant therapy after subtotal resections (STRs) of gangliogliomas. The objective of this study was to examine and review the Mayo Clinic experience of 88 patients with gangliogliomas, their follow-up, risk of recurrence, and the role of radiation therapy after STR or only biopsy. Methods. Eighty-eight patients with gangliogliomas diagnosed between 1970 and 2007 were reviewed. Data on clinical outcomes and therapy received were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Results. The median age at diagnosis was 19 years. The median potential follow-up as of June 2008 was 142 months (range 9-416 months). Fifteen-year overall survival was 94%, median PFS was 5.6 years, with a 10-year PFS rate of 37%. Progression-free survival was dramatically affected by extent of initial resection (p < 0.0001). Conclusions. This single-institution retrospective series of patients with gangliogliomas is unique given its large cohort size with a long follow-up duration, and confirms the excellent long-term survival rate in this group. The study also shows the importance of resection extent on likelihood of recurrence. Patients with gangliogliomas who undergo STR or biopsy alone have poor PFS. Radiation therapy may delay time to progression in patients with unresectable disease. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2012.7.JNS111260)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据