4.6 Article

Nonthermal irreversible electroporation for intracranial surgical applications Laboratory investigation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 114, 期 3, 页码 681-688

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091448

关键词

brain cancer therapy; minimally invasive surgery; nonthermal ablation; tumor ablation; electropermeabilization

资金

  1. Coulter Foundation
  2. AngioDynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. Nonthermal irreversible electroporation (NTIRE) is a novel, minimally invasive technique to treat cancer, which is unique because of its nonthermal mechanism of tumor ablation. This paper evaluates the safety of an NTIRE procedure to lesion normal canine brain tissue. Methods. The WIRE procedure involved placing electrodes into a targeted area of brain in 3 dogs and delivering a series of short and intense electric pulses. The voltages of the pulses applied were varied between dogs. Another dog was used as a sham control. One additional clog was treated at an extreme voltage to determine the upper safety limits of the procedure. Ultrasonography was used at the time of the procedure to determine if the lesions could be visualized intraoperatively. The volumes of ablated tissue were then estimated on postprocedure MR imaging. Histological brain sections were then analyzed to evaluate the lesions produced. Results. The animals tolerated the procedure with no apparent complications except for the animal that was treated at the upper voltage limit. The lesion volume appeared to decrease with decreasing voltage of applied pulses. Histological examination revealed cell death within the treated volume with a submillimeter transition zone between necrotic and normal brain. Conclusions. The authors' results reveal that NTIRE at selected voltages can be safely administered in normal canine brain and that the volume of ablated tissue correlates with the voltage of the applied pulses. This preliminary study is the first step toward using NTIRE as a brain cancer treatment. (DOI:10.3171/2010.5.JNS091448)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据