4.6 Article

Alteration of thrombospondin-1 and -2 in rat brains following experimental intracerebral hemorrhage

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 113, 期 4, 页码 820-825

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS09637

关键词

intracerebral hemorrhage; thrombospondin-1; thrombospondin-2; angiogenesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30400581, 30873221]
  2. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2005038224]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation [07JJ5007]
  4. Hunan Provincial Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2008016]
  5. Graduate degree thesis Innovation Foundation of Central South University [2008yb048]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is among the most intractable forms of stroke. Angiogenesis, an orchestrated balance between proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, is a fundamental process to brain development and repair by new blood vessel formation from preexisting ones and can be induced by ICH. Thrombospondin (TSP)-1 and TSP-2 are naturally occurring antiangiogenic factors. The aim of this study was to observe their expression in rat brains with ICH. Methods. Intracerebral hemorrhage was induced in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats by stereotactic injection of collagenase VII or autologous blood into the right globus pallidus. The expression of TSP-1 and -2 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. Results. After the induction of ICH, some TSP1- or TSP2-immunoreactive microvessels resided around the hematoma for similar to 7 days and extended into a clot thereafter. Cerebral endothelial cells expressed the TSPs. The expression of TSP-1 and TSP-2 mRNA peaked at 4 and 14 days after collagenase-induced ICH, respectively. Conclusions. Findings in this study suggest that ICH can alter the expression of TSP-1 and TSP-2, which may be involved in modulating angiogenesis in brains following ICH. (DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS09637)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据