4.6 Article

Comparison of the surgical and follow-up costs associated with microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 108, 期 6, 页码 1220-1224

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/6/1220

关键词

cost; follow-up; microsurgery; radiosurgery; vestibular schwannoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Object. The best approach to the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to analyze the initial and follow-up costs of resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with VS. Methods. Initial and follow-up costs in 53 cases in which patients with unilateral, previously unoperated VSs > 3 cm underwent resection (21 cases) or radiosurgery (32 cases) at the Mayo Clinic from June 2000 until July 2002 were analyzed for 36 months. Follow-up treatment-specific utilization records were gathered prospectively for patients not returning to the Mayo Clinic after treatment. Six-month moving averages of incremental follow-up costs were calculated for the 2 patient groups. Results. The mean cost of surgery in the microsurgery group was $23,788 (95% confidence interval $22,280-$24,842) compared with $16,143 (95% confidence interval $15,277-$17,545) for the radiosurgical group. Mean incremental follow-up costs per month for patients in the microsurgery group started just > $1000 per month, decreased steadily, and remained < $70 per month by the 10th month of follow-up. Mean incremental follow-up costs per month for patients in the radiosurgery group were < $10 per month for the first few months and thereafter increased to as much as $200 per month. Conclusions. Although the total cost of microsurgery is higher due to the costs of hospitalization, follow-up costs for radiosurgery are greater in general. From a societal perspective, radiosurgery is less expensive than microsurgical resection provided that the rate of tumor progression after radiosurgery remains low with long-term follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据