4.5 Article

Using Membrane-Targeted Green Fluorescent Protein To Monitor Neurotoxic Protein-Dependent Degeneration of Drosophila Eyes

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 92, 期 9, 页码 1100-1109

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.23395

关键词

neurodegeneration; polyglutamine; spinocerebellar ataxia; Parkinson's; Alzheimer's; Huntington's

资金

  1. NINDS [R00NS064097]
  2. NCI [T32-CA009531]
  3. National Ataxia Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related neurodegeneration has been studied extensively through the use of model organisms, including the genetically versatile Drosophila melanogaster. Various neurotoxic proteins have been expressed in fly eyes to approximate degeneration occurring in humans, and much has been learned from this heterologous system. Although Drosophila expedites scientific research through rapid generational times and relative inexpensiveness, one factor that can hinder analyses is the examination of milder forms of degeneration caused by some toxic proteins in fly eyes. Whereas several disease proteins cause massive degeneration that is easily observed by examining the external structure of the fly eye, others cause mild degeneration that is difficult to observe externally and requires laborious histological preparation to assess and monitor. Here, we describe a sensitive fluorescence-based method to observe, monitor, and quantify mild Drosophila eye degeneration caused by various proteins, including the polyglutamine disease proteins ataxin-3 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 3) and huntingtin (Huntington's disease), mutant alpha-synuclein (Parkinson's disease), and A beta 42 (Alzheimer's disease). We show that membrane-targeted green fluorescent protein reports degeneration robustly and quantitatively. This simple yet powerful technique, which is amenable to large-scale screens, can help accelerate studies to understand age-related degeneration and to find factors that suppress it for therapeutic purposes. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据