4.5 Article

Therapeutic Time Window and Dose Response of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells for Ischemic Stroke

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 833-839

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22614

关键词

stem cell; stroke; bone marrow

资金

  1. NIH [NS064316]
  2. American Heart Association
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. Notsew Orm Sands Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although mononuclear cells (MNCs) from bone marrow are being investigated in phase I clinical trials in stroke patients, dose response, therapeutic time window, and biodistribiton have not been well-characterized in animal stroke models. Long Evans rats underwent common carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion (CCA/MCAo) and 24 hr later were randomized to receive saline IV or a bone marrow aspiration followed by an IV infusion of autologous separated MNCs (1 million, 10 million, or 30 million cells/kg). In another experiment, rats underwent CCAo/MCAo and were randomized at 24 hr, 72 hr, or 7 days after stroke to receive a saline injection or 10 million/kg MNCs. All animals were evaluated on the cylinder and corner tests up to 28 days. MNCs were tracked using Q-dot nanocrystals to monitor biodistribution. Animals treated with MNCs at 10 million and 30 million cells/kg at 24 hr after stroke had significant reductions in neurological deficits and lesion size compared with saline controls or animals treated with 1 million cells/kg. There was no difference in neurological deficits in the 10 and 30 million cell/kg groups at 28 days. Animals treated with MNCs at 72 hr but not at 7 days showed a significant reduction in neurological deficits by 28 days. Labeled MNCs were found in the brain, spleen, lung, liver, and kidney at 1 hr and exponentially decreased over the ensuing week. In conclusion, we found a maximum reduction in neurological deficits at 10 and 30 million cells/kg and a therapeutic time window up to 72 hr after stroke. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据