4.5 Article

Spontaneously Immortalized Schwann Cells From Adult Fischer Rat as a Valuable Tool for Exploring Neuron-Schwann Cell Interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 898-908

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22605

关键词

dorsal root ganglia; Schwann cells; myelination; cell culture; adult

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan [22500324]
  2. Yokohama Foundation for Advancement of Medical Science, Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22500324, 21500341] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We established spontaneously immortalized Schwann cell lines from long-term cultures of adult Fischer 344 rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and peripheral nerves. One of these cell lines, designated immortalized Fischer rat Schwann cells 1 (IFRS1), showed spindle-shaped morphology; immunoreactivity for S100, p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75(NTR)), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), laminin, and vimentin; and mRNA expression of neurotrophic factors (NGF, GDNF, and CNTF), neurotrophin receptors (p75(NTR), truncated TrkB, and TrkC), cell adhesion molecules (L1, NCAM, and N-cadherin), myelin proteins [P0, PMP22, and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG)], transcription factors (Krox20, Sox10, and Oct6), neuregulin-1 receptors (ErbB2 and ErbB3), and an orphan G protein-coupled receptor (Gpr126). Conditioned medium (CM) obtained from IFRS1 cells exhibited potent biological activity for the promotion of neuronal survival and neurite outgrowth of cultured adult rat DRG neurons. Furthermore, light and electron microscopic analyses revealed that IFRS1 cells were capable of myelinating neurites while in coculture with adult rat DRG neurons. These findings indicate that IFRS1 cells possess some biological properties of mature Schwann cells and that the coculture system with adult DRG neurons and IFRS1 cells can be a useful tool for the study of peripheral nerve degeneration and regeneration. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据