4.5 Article

Peripherally Expressed Neprilysin Reduces Brain Amyloid Burden: A Novel Approach for Treating Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 6, 页码 1462-1473

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21944

关键词

gene therapy; peptidases; amyloid clearance

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20RR02017] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG 24899, R21 AG024899] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA002243, DA 02243, R01 DA002243-30A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of therapeutic strategies for treating Alzheimer's disease have focused on reducing amyloid burden in the brain. Among these approaches, the expression of amyloid beta peptide (A beta)-degrading enzymes in the brain has been shown to be effective but to date not practical for treating patients. We report here a novel strategy for lowering amyloid burden in the brain by peripherally expressing the A beta-degrading enzyme neprilysin on leukocytes in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Through transplantation of lentivirus-transduced bone marrow cells, the A beta-degrading protease neprilysin was expressed on the surface of leukocytes. This peripheral neprilysin reduced soluble brain A beta peptide levels by similar to 30% and lowered the accumulation of amyloid beta peptides by 50-60% when transplantation was performed at both young and early adult age. In addition, peripheral neprilysin expression reduced amyloid-dependent performance deficits as measured by the Morris water maze. Unlike other methods designed to lower A beta levels in blood, which cause a net increase in peptide, neprilysin expression results in the catabolism of A beta to small, innocuous peptide fragments. These findings demonstrate that peripherally expressed neprilysin, and likely other A beta-degrading enzymes, has the potential to be utilized as a therapeutic approach to prevent and treat Alzheimer's disease and suggest that this approach should be explored further. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据