4.5 Article

Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Neural Cell Model of Spinal Muscular Atrophy

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 12, 页码 2748-2756

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22106

关键词

apoptosis; cytochrome c oxidase; free radicals; mitochondria; motor neuron disease

资金

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association [4044]
  2. Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations of the survival motor neuron (SMN) gene in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) lead to anterior horn cell death. The cause is unknown, but motor neurons depend substantially on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) for normal function. Therefore, mitochondrial parameters were analyzed in an SMA cell culture model using small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection that decreased Smn expression in NSC-34 cells to disease levels. Smn siRNA knock-down resulted in 35% and 66% reduced Smn protein levels 48 and 72 hr posttransfection, respectively. ATP levels were reduced by 14% and 26% at 48 and 72 hr posttransfection, respectively, suggesting decreased ATP production or increased energy demand in neural cells. Smn knock-down resulted in increased mitochondrial membrane potential and increased free radical production. Changes in activity of cytochrome c oxidase (CcO), a key OxPhos component, were observed at 72 hr with a 26% increase in oxygen consumption. This suggests a compensatory activation of the aerobic pathway, resulting in increased mitochondrial membrane potentials, a condition known to lead to the observed increase in free radical production. Further testing suggested that changes in ATP at 24 hr precede observable indices of cell injury at 48 hr. We propose that energy paucity and increased mitochondrial free radical production lead to accumulated cell damage and eventual cell death in Smn-depleted neural cells. Mitochondrial dysfunction may therefore be important in SMA pathology and may represent a new therapeutic target. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据