4.4 Article

A reliable approach to distinguish between transient with and without HFOs using TQWT and MCA

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 232, 期 -, 页码 36-46

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.025

关键词

Epilepsy; High frequency oscillations (HFOs); Transient with HFOs (TWH); Transient without HFOs (TWHH); Tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT); Morphological component analysis (MCA); Complex Monet wavelet (CMW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have reported that discrete high frequency oscillations (HFOs) in the range of 80-500 Hz may serve as promising biomarkers of the seizure focus in humans. Visual scoring of HFOs is tiring, time consuming, highly subjective and requires a great deal of mental concentration. Due to the recent explosion of HFOs research, development of a robust automated detector is expected to play a vital role in studying HFOs and their relationship to epileptogenesis. Therefore, a handful of automated detectors have been introduced in the literature over the past few years. In fact, all the proposed methods have been associated with high false-positive rates, which essentially arising from filtered sharp transients like spikes, sharp waves and artifacts. In order to specifically minimize false positive rates and improve the specificity of HFOs detection, we proposed a new approach, which is a combination of tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT), morphological component analysis (MCA) and complex Monet wavelet (CMW). The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows: The proposed method results in a sensitivity of 96.77%, a specificity of 85.00% and a false discovery rate (FDR) of 07.41%. Compared to this, the classical CMW method applied directly on the signals without pre-processing by TQWT-MCA achieves a sensitivity of 98.71%, a specificity of 18.75%, and an FDR of 29.95%. The proposed method may be considered highly accurate to distinguish between transients with and without HFOs. Consequently, it is remarkably reliable and robust for the detection of HFOs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据