4.4 Review

A review of multivariate methods for multimodal fusion of brain imaging data

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 204, 期 1, 页码 68-81

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.10.031

关键词

Multivariate methods; Multimodal fusion; ICA; CCA; PLS; MRI

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EB 006841, R01EB 005846]
  2. National Sciences Foundation [1017718, 1016619]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1016619] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1017718] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of various neuroimaging techniques is rapidly improving the measurements of brain function/structure. However, despite improvements in individual modalities, it is becoming increasingly clear that the most effective research approaches will utilize multi-modal fusion, which takes advantage of the fact that each modality provides a limited view of the brain. The goal of multi-modal fusion is to capitalize on the strength of each modality in a joint analysis, rather than a separate analysis of each. This is a more complicated endeavor that must be approached more carefully and efficient methods should be developed to draw generalized and valid conclusions from high dimensional data with a limited number of subjects. Numerous research efforts have been reported in the field based on various statistical approaches, e.g. independent component analysis (ICA), canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and partial least squares (PLS). In this review paper, we survey a number of multivariate methods appearing in previous multimodal fusion reports, mostly fMRI with other modality, which were performed with or without prior information. A table for comparing optimization assumptions, purpose of the analysis, the need of priors, dimension reduction strategies and input data types is provided, which may serve as a valuable reference that helps readers understand the trade-offs of the 7 methods comprehensively. Finally, we evaluate 3 representative methods via simulation and give some suggestions on how to select an appropriate method based on a given research. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据