4.4 Article

A novel approach for documenting naming errors induced by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 204, 期 2, 页码 349-354

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.11.003

关键词

Neuronavigation; TMS; Speech mapping; Preoperative planning; Anomia; Paraphasias

资金

  1. SalWe-SHOK
  2. Helsinki University Central Hospital (EVO-funding)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used both in basic research and in clinical practice. TMS has been utilized in studies of functional organization of speech in healthy volunteers. Navigated TMS (nTMS) allows preoperative mapping of the motor cortex for surgical planning. Recording behavioral responses to nTMS in the speech-related cortical network in a manner that allows off-line review of performance might increase utility of nTMS both for scientific and clinical purposes, e.g., for a careful preoperative planning. Four subjects participated in the study. The subjects named pictures of objects presented every 2-3 s on a computer screen. One-second trains of 5 pulses were applied by nTMS 300 ms after the presentation of pictures. The nTMS and stimulus presentation screens were cloned. A commercial digital camera was utilized to record the subject's performance and the screen clones. Delays between presentation, audio and video signals were eliminated by carefully tested combination of displays and camera. An experienced neuropsychologist studied the videos and classified the errors evoked by nTMS during the object naming. Complete anomias, semantic, phonological and performance errors were observed during nTMS of left fronto-parieto-temporal cortical regions. Several errors were detected only in the video classification. nTMS combined with synchronized video recording provides an accurate monitoring tool of behavioral TMS experiments. This experimental setup can be particularly useful for high-quality cognitive paradigms and for clinical purposes. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据