4.4 Article

The development of an implantable catheter system for chronic or intermittent convection-enhanced delivery

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 203, 期 2, 页码 284-291

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.10.002

关键词

Convection-enhanced delivery; Catheter; Chronic implantation; Blockage; Pig; Rat

资金

  1. Cure Parkinson's Trust
  2. Friends of the Bristol Oncology and Haematology Centre
  3. MRC [G0601745] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0601745] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is a promising technique for the administration of therapeutic agents such as cytotoxics, neurotrophins and enzymes to the brain. In this study we describe the development of an implantable catheter system that is compatible with long-term intermittent CED. Catheters made from fused silica. PEEK or carbothane, and of various internal and external diameters were implanted in the striatum of rats and assessed for patency at 21 or 28 days. A high-rate of catheter blockage was observed with all fused silica and PEEK catheters. Carbothane catheters with an outer diameter of 0.6 mm and an inner diameter of 0.35 mm had significantly lower rates of blockage (P <= 0.01). Carbothane catheters were then implanted into 4 Large White/Landrace pigs and 4 NIH miniature pigs and infusions undertaken at monthly intervals to evaluate catheter patency and infusate distribution. Catheter patency was demonstrated for a maximum period of 163 days in one animal. Widespread and reproducible intraputamenal CED could be achieved with intermittent drug delivery at flow-rates as high as 5 mu l/min. Problems were encountered using the pig model due to catheter distortion from rapid animal growth. In conclusion, it is possible to achieve intermittent high-flow CED with a chronic implanted carbothane catheter with a low rate of catheter blockage. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据