4.4 Article

Portable microstimulator for chronic deep brain stimulation in freely moving rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 209, 期 1, 页码 50-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.027

关键词

Implantable device; High frequency stimulation; Electrode; Parkinson's disease; Rodent; Subthalamic nucleus

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille University, Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-05-NEUR-013-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the last decades, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been widely used as a functional surgical strategy for the treatment of a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia, epilepsy, depression or obsessive-compulsive disorder. While the therapeutic benefits of DBS are now recognized, experimental data on its mechanisms and impact at long term remain poor. This is mainly due to the lack of a microstimulation system adapted for chronic DBS in small laboratory animals. In this context, we have developed a microstimulator for DBS adapted to rat. This device, which has a size and weight compatible for use in freely moving rat, can be clipped to a support fixed on the animal's head. This easy removal property is crucial because it enables removing or even switching the microstimulator during the experiments without having to anaesthetize or to operate the animal, thus minimizing stress. The design of the microstimulator allows to set the DBS parameters easily (intensity, frequency and pulse width) and to replace the battery for long-term DBS. To validate our device, we performed continuous DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (known to improve motor deficits in clinic) in a classical rat model of PD during 5 weeks. We show that this long duration stimulation reduces significantly PD-induced akinesia without inducing animal discomfort and tissue damage. These first data demonstrated that long term DBS procedure in behaving rat is now workable. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据