4.4 Article

A semi-automated method for identifying and measuring myelinated nerve fibers in scanning electron microscope images

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 201, 期 1, 页码 149-158

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.07.026

关键词

Image segmentation; Axon; Myelin; Nerve; Semi-automated; Scanning electron microscope

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. MSFHR
  3. CIHR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnosing illnesses, developing and comparing treatment methods, and conducting research on the organization of the peripheral nervous system often require the analysis of peripheral nerve images to quantify the number, myelination, and size of axons in a nerve. Current methods that require manually labeling each axon can be extremely time-consuming as a single nerve can contain thousands of axons. To improve efficiency, we developed a computer-assisted axon identification and analysis method that is capable of analyzing and measuring sub-images covering the nerve cross-section, acquired using a scanning electron microscope. This algorithm performs three main procedures - it first uses cross-correlation to combine the acquired sub-images into a large image showing the entire nerve cross-section, then identifies and individually labels axons using a series of image intensity and shape criteria, and finally identifies and labels the myelin sheath of each axon using a region growing algorithm with the geometric centers of axons as seeds. To ensure accurate analysis of the image, we incorporated manual supervision to remove mislabeled axons and add missed axons. The typical user-assisted processing time for a two-megapixel image containing over 2000 axons was less than 1 h. This speed was almost eight times faster than the time required to manually process the same image. Our method has proven to be well suited for identifying axons and their characteristics, and represents a significant time savings over traditional manual methods. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据