4.4 Article

Production of functional recombinant G-protein coupled receptors for heteromerization studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 199, 期 2, 页码 258-264

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.05.021

关键词

Heteromer; Adenosine; Dopamine; Histamine; Cloning; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [SAF2008-00146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a diverse protein family of receptors that transduce signals from the extracellular surrounding to intracellular signaling molecules evoking various cellular responses. It is now widely accepted that GPCRs are expressed and function as dimers or most probably as oligomers of more than two receptor protomers. The heteromer has different biochemical and pharmacological characteristics from the monomers, which increases the functional responses of GPCRs. GPCRs are involved in many diseases, and are also the target of around half of all modern medicinal drugs. In the case of Parkinson's disease, a degenerative process caused by gradual disappearance of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons, it is suspected that the targets for treatment should be dopamine-receptor-containing heteromers. Technologies based on the use of fluorescent- or luminescent-fused receptors and adaptations of resonance energy transfer (RET) techniques have been useful in investigating the functional inter-relationships between receptors in a heteromer. In this study functional recombinant adenosine A(2A)-Rluc, dopamine D(2)-GFP(2) and histamine H(3)-YFP receptor fusion proteins were successfully cloned and characterized, producing the essential basis for heteromerization studies between these receptors. This might provide a better insight into their pharmacological and functional inter-relationships in the brain and enable the design and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies for Parkinson's disease. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据