4.4 Article

A new method to isolate microglia from adult mice and culture them for an extended period of time

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 187, 期 2, 页码 243-253

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.01.017

关键词

Microglia; Primary culture; Isolation method; C8-B4 cell line; Potassium channels; Nitric oxide; Cytokine; Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the major immuno-competent cells of the brain, microglia are highly implicated in neuro-protection as well as in neurodegeneration. Therefore, they are of key interest for research on numerous CNS diseases. Currently, to model inflammation in the brain, microglial cell lines or primary microglia prepared from embryonic or neo-natal rodents are widely used. However, these in vitro microglial models are not suitable for research in the field of neuro-degenerative diseases where aging is a crucial parameter. Only a few in vitro studies on aged microglia have been published so far, most of which use ex vivo microglia which cannot be kept in culture for prolonged periods of time. In the present study, we provide a new approach which allows the isolation and culture of an almost pure population of microglia from adult mouse brains. The isolation is based on a procedure which combines density separation and a subsequent culture selection process. After these steps, microglia form a non-adherent floating cell layer that can be easily and repeatedly harvested and replated. This method is simple and allows for a comparatively high yield and purity of adult microglial cells. The collected primary adult microglia proliferate and can be kept in culture for extended periods of time. We compared the primary adult microglia to primary microglia from neo-natal mice as well as to the C8-B4 microglial cell line. We found that adult microglia have similar, but not identical, immuno-phenotypic, functional and electrophysiological characteristics to the other in vitro models. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据