4.4 Article

Systemic RNA interference for the study of learning and memory in an insect

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
卷 179, 期 1, 页码 9-15

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.01.002

关键词

Double-stranded RNA; RNA interference; Insect; Long-term memory; Olfactory learning; Nitric oxide; Cricket

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful technique for the study of molecular mechanisms underlying many biological processes, including brain functions. Among methods for RNAi, systemic administration of double-stranded RNA (systemic RNAi) is the most convenient for basic research as well as medical application, but it has yielded only limited success. To our knowledge, systemic RNAi has not been achieved for the study of learning and memory in any animals. Here we demonstrate successful systemic RNAi of the NOS gene coding for nitric oxide synthase, which, as we previously suggested, plays a critical role in the formation of olfactory long-term memory (LTM), in the nymphal cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. In situ hybridization demonstrated a high level of expression of NOS in a subset of Kenyon cells of the mushroom body, which is known to participate in olfactory learning and memory, in addition to some neurons around the antenna lobe and the base of the optic lobe. Injection of NOS double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) into the haemolymph completely impaired 1-day memory retention, although 30 min retention was unaffected. This impairment was fully rescued by injection of an NO donor, NOR3, thus suggesting that the effect of NOS dsRNA is through inhibition of NOS. Inhibition of NOS had no effects on recall of LTM. The results demonstrate that silencing of NOS expression by systemic RNAi impairs LTM formation. Systemic RNAi will become a useful method for study of the molecular mechanisms of learning and memory. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据