4.4 Article

A retrospective dosimetric comparison of TG43 and a commercially available MBDCA for an APBI brachytherapy patient cohort

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.05.010

关键词

Treatment planning; Dosimetry; Accelerated partial breast irradiation; Model-based dose calculation algorithms; DVH analysis; Dose homogeneity and conformity indices

资金

  1. European Union (European Social Fund - ESF)
  2. national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Bilateral Greece-Hungary research & technology agreement [HUN74 / 11817, TET_10-1-2011-0565]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To compare dosimetry using a contemporary model based dose calculation algorithm (MBDCA) following TG186 recommendations, and the conventional TG43 method in an Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) patient cohort. Methods: Data of 38 APBI patients were studied. Dosimetry for the treatment plans was performed using both the TG43 and TG186 dose calculation methods of the Oncentra Brachy v4.4 treatment planning system (TPS). Analysis included indices of clinical interest for the planning target volume (PTV coverage, dose homogeneity, conformity) as well as dose volume histograms (DVH) for the breast, lung, heart, rib and skin. Significance testing of observed differences between TG43 and TG186 results was carried out and the effect of target location to these differences was studied. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in the values of clinically relevant DVH parameters for the PTV and the organs at risk (OAR), except for the heart. Differences for the PTV are relatively small (<1% for coverage, on the order of 2% for homogeneity and conformity) with a slight TG43 overestimation except for the dose homogeneity. Percentage differences are larger for the rib and lung (on the order of 4% for Dmax and 5% for V10Gy, respectively) and maximum for the skin (on the order of 6% for D10cc), with a correlation of the observed differences with target location. Conclusion: While the MBDCA option of the TPS appears to improve dosimetric accuracy, differences from TG43 do not appear to warrant dose prescription changes or treatment protocol amendment. (C) 2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据