4.7 Article

Spatial and Temporal Eye-Hand Coordination Relies on the Parietal Reach Region

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 34, 期 38, 页码 12884-12892

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3719-13.2014

关键词

inactivation; movement endpoints; PPC; reaches; reaction time; saccades

资金

  1. NIH [EY007492, EY013337, EY005522]
  2. DARPA [N66001-10-C-2009]
  3. NIH Career Development [K99 NS062894]
  4. Herman- and Lilly Schilling Foundation
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG) [WI 406/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coordinated eye movements are crucial for precision control of our hands. A commonly believed neural mechanism underlying eye-hand coordination is interaction between the neural networks controlling each effector, exchanging, and matching information, such as movement target location and onset time. Alternatively, eye-hand coordination may result simply from common inputs to independent eye and hand control pathways. Thus far, it remains unknown whether and where either of these two possible mechanisms exists. A candidate location for the former mechanism, interpathway communication, includes the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) where distinct effector-specific areas reside. If the PPC were within the network for eye-hand coordination, perturbing it would affect both eye and hand movements that are concurrently planned. In contrast, if eye-hand coordination arises solely from common inputs, perturbing one effector pathway, e.g., the parietal reach region (PRR), would not affect the other effector. To test these hypotheses, we inactivated part of PRR in the macaque, located in the medial bank of the intraparietal sulcus encompassing the medial intraparietal area and area 5V. When each effector moved alone, PRR inactivation shortened reach but not saccade amplitudes, compatible with the known reach-selective activity of PRR. However, when both effectors moved concurrently, PRR inactivation shortened both reach and saccade amplitudes, and decoupled their reaction times. Therefore, consistent with the interpathway communication hypothesis, we propose that the planning of concurrent eye and hand movements causes the spatial information in PRR to influence the otherwise independent eye control pathways, and that their temporal coupling requires an intact PRR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据