4.7 Article

Reward Inference by Primate Prefrontal and Striatal Neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 1380-1396

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2263-13.2014

关键词

inference; model-based learning; model-free learning; prefrontal cortex; reward; striatum

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [1232005]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
  4. Shanghai Pujiang Program [13PJ1402000]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23500186, 26280093] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The brain contains multiple yet distinct systems involved in reward prediction. To understand the nature of these processes, we recorded single-unit activity from the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) and the striatum in monkeys performing a reward inference task using an asymmetric reward schedule. We found that neurons both in the LPFC and in the striatum predicted reward values for stimuli that had been previously well experienced with set reward quantities in the asymmetric reward task. Importantly, these LPFC neurons could predict the reward value of a stimulus using transitive inference even when the monkeys had not yet learned the stimulus-reward association directly; whereas these striatal neurons did not show such an ability. Nevertheless, because there were two set amounts of reward (large and small), the selected striatal neurons were able to exclusively infer the reward value (e.g., large) of one novel stimulus from a pair after directly experiencing the alternative stimulus with the other reward value (e.g., small). Our results suggest that although neurons that predict reward value for old stimuli in the LPFC could also do so for new stimuli via transitive inference, those in the striatum could only predict reward for new stimuli via exclusive inference. Moreover, the striatum showed more complex functions than was surmised previously for model-free learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据