4.7 Article

Ovarian Cycle Effects on Immediate Reward Selection Bias in Humans: A Role for Estradiol

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 34, 期 16, 页码 5468-5476

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0014-14.2014

关键词

COMT; decision-making; delay discounting; dopamine; estrogen; impulsivity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [UL1RR025747, KL2RR025746, P60AA011605, T32NS007431, F31AA020132]
  2. University of North Carolina Lindquist Faculty Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A variety of evidence suggests that, among humans, the individual tendency to choose immediate rewards (Now) over larger, delayed rewards (Later), or Now bias, varies with frontal dopamine (DA) levels. As cyclic elevations in estradiol (E+) modulate other frontal DA-dependent behaviors, we tested ovarian cycle effects on Now bias, and whether any such effects are E+ mediated. To do so, we quantifiedNow/Later choice behavior in naturally cycling adult females (n = 87; ages 18-40 years) during both the menstrual phase (MP; cycle day 1-2; lowE+), and the follicular phase (FP; cycle day 11-12; highE+). Nowbias decreased an average of 3.6% fromMPtoFP(p = 0.006). Measures of salivary E+ levels at each visit were available in a subsample of participants (n = 34). Participants with a verified E+ rise from MP to FP showed significantly greater decreases in Now bias at mid-cycle (n = 23) than those without a rise (n = 11; p = 0.03); Nowbias decreased an average of 10.2% in the E+ rise group but increased an average of 7.9% in the no E+ rise group. The change in Now bias from MP to FP inversely correlated with the change in E + (rho = -0.39; p = 0.023), an effect driven by individuals with putatively lower frontal DA based on genotype at the Val(158) Met polymorphism in the COMT gene. This is the first demonstration that intertemporal choice varies across the ovarian cycle, with Now bias declining at mid-cycle, when fertility peaks. Moreover, our data suggest that the interacting effects of estradiol and frontal DA mediate this cycle effect on decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据