4.7 Article

Disruption of Arp2/3 Results in Asymmetric Structural Plasticity of Dendritic Spines and Progressive Synaptic and Behavioral Abnormalities

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 14, 页码 6081-6092

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0035-13.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-NS059957]
  2. March of Dimes [6-FY10-289]
  3. Duke Fellowship in Postdoctoral Training Program in Fundamental and Translational Neuroscience
  4. Janos Bolyai Research Fellowship from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  5. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [K83830]
  6. NIDA [R01DA027807]
  7. NIMH [U19 MH082441]
  8. North Carolina Biotechnology Center
  9. NINDS [R01NS035527, R01NS068410]
  10. HHMI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite evidence for a strong genetic contribution to several major psychiatric disorders, individual candidate genes account for only a small fraction of these disorders, leading to the suggestion that multigenetic pathways may be involved. Several known genetic risk factors for psychiatric disease are related to the regulation of actin polymerization, which plays a key role in synaptic plasticity. To gain insight into and test the possible pathogenetic role of this pathway, we designed a conditional knock-out of the Arp2/3 complex, a conserved final output for actin signaling pathways that orchestrates de novo actin polymerization. Here we report that postnatal loss of the Arp2/3 subunit ArpC3 in forebrain excitatory neurons leads to an asymmetric structural plasticity of dendritic spines, followed by a progressive loss of spine synapses. This progression of synaptic deficits corresponds with an evolution of distinct cognitive, psychomotor, and social disturbances as the mice age. Together, these results point to the dysfunction of actin signaling, specifically that which converges to regulate Arp2/3, as an important cellular pathway that may contribute to the etiology of complex psychiatric disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据