4.7 Article

Decrease in Muscle Contraction Time Complements Neural Maturation in the Development of Dynamic Manipulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 33, 期 38, 页码 15050-15055

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1968-13.2013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Education, NIDRR [H133E080024]
  2. NSF [EFRI-COPN 0836042]
  3. National Institutes of Health [AR050520, AR052345]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developmental improvements in dynamic manipulation abilities are typically attributed to neural maturation, such as myelination of corticospinal pathways, neuronal pruning, and synaptogenesis. However the contributions from changes in the peripheral motor system are less well understood. Here we investigated whether there are developmental changes in muscle activation-contraction dynamics and whether these changes contribute to improvements in dynamic manipulation in humans. We compared pinch strength, dynamic manipulation ability, and contraction time of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in typically developing preadolescent, adolescent, and young adults. Both strength and dynamic manipulation ability increased with age (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.00001, respectively). Surprisingly, adults had a 33% lower muscle contraction time compared with preadolescents (p < 0.01), and contraction time showed a significant (p < 0.005) association with dynamic manipulation abilities. Whereas decreases in muscle contraction time during development have been reported in the animal literature, our finding, to our knowledge, is the first report of this phenomenon in humans and the first finding of its association with manipulation. Consequently, the changes in the muscle contractile properties could be an important complement to neural maturation in the development of dynamic manipulation. These findings have important implications for understanding central and peripheral contributors to deficits in manipulation in atypical development, such as in children with cerebral palsy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据