4.7 Article

Connectivity-Based Parcellation of the Human Orbitofrontal Cortex

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 32, 期 18, 页码 6240-6250

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0257-12.2012

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GQ0411]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P1_128574]
  3. Excellence Initiative of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [GSC86/1-2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primate orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is involved in reward processing, learning, and decision making. Research in monkeys has shown that this region is densely connected with higher sensory, limbic, and subcortical regions. Moreover, a parcellation of the monkey OFC into two subdivisions has been suggested based on its intrinsic anatomical connections. However, in humans, little is known about any functional subdivisions of the OFC except for a rather coarse medial/lateral distinction. Here, we used resting-state fMRI in combination with unsupervised clustering techniques to investigate whether OFC subdivisions can be revealed based on their functional connectivity profiles with other brain regions. Examination of different cluster solutions provided support for a parcellation into two parts as observed in monkeys, but it also highlighted a much finer hierarchical clustering of the orbital surface. Specifically, we identified (1) a medial, (2) a posterior-central, (3) a central, and (4-6) three lateral clusters spanning the anterior-posterior gradient. Consistent with animal tracing studies, these OFC clusters were connected to other cortical regions such as prefrontal, temporal, and parietal cortices but also subcortical areas in the striatum and the midbrain. These connectivity patterns provide important implications for identifying specific functional roles of OFC subdivisions for reward processing, learning, and decision making. Moreover, this parcellation schema can provide guidance to report results in future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据