4.7 Article

Inner Hair Cells Are Not Required for Survival of Spiral Ganglion Neurons in the Adult Cochlea

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 405-410

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4678-11.2012

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 DC0188, R01 DC04820, P30 DC5029]
  2. Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Enhancement, Children's Hospital Boston
  3. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center NIH [P30-HD 18655]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of sensorineural hearing loss have long suggested that survival of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) depends on trophic support provided by their peripheral targets, the inner hair cells (IHCs): following ototoxic drugs or acoustic overexposure, IHC death is rapid whereas SGN degeneration is always delayed. However, recent noise-trauma studies show that SGNs can die even when hair cells survive, and transgenic mouse models show that supporting cell dysfunction can cause SGN degeneration in the absence of IHC pathology. To reexamine this issue, we studied a model of IHC loss that does not involve noise or ototoxic drugs. Mice lacking the gene for the high-affinity thiamine transporter (Slc19a2) have normal cochlear structure and function when fed a regular (thiamine-rich) diet. However, dietary thiamine restriction causes widespread, rapid (within 10 d) loss of IHCs. Using this model, we show that SGNs can survive for months after IHC loss, indicating that (1) IHCs are not necessary for neuronal survival, (2) neuronal loss in the other hearing loss models is likely due to effects of the trauma on the sensory neurons or other inner ear cells, and (3) that other cells, most likely supporting cells of the organ of Corti, are the main source of SGN survival factors. These results overturn a long-standing dogma in the study of sensorineural hearing loss and highlight the importance of cochlear supporting cells in neuronal survival in the adult inner ear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据