4.7 Article

Coordination of High Gamma Activity in Anterior Cingulate and Lateral Prefrontal Cortical Areas during Adaptation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 31, 期 31, 页码 11110-11117

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1016-11.2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fyssen Foundation
  2. NRJ Foundation
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [JCJC 06]
  4. Region Rhone-Alpes
  5. Ministere de l'Education et de la Recherche
  6. Facultad de Medicina Universidad de Valparaiso [MECESUP UVA-106]
  7. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) process complementary information for planning and evaluating behavior. This suggests at least that processes in these two areas are coordinated during behavioral adaptation. We analyzed local field potentials recorded in both regions in two monkeys performing a problem-solving task that alternated exploration and repetitive behaviors with the specific prediction that neural activity should reveal interareal coordination mainly during exploration. Both areas showed increased high gamma power after errors in exploration and after rewards in exploitation. We found that high gamma (60 - 140 Hz) power increases in ACC were followed by a later increase in LPFC only after negative feedback (errors) or first positive feedback (correct) during the exploration period. The difference in latencies between the two structures disappeared in repetition period. Simultaneous recordings revealed correlations between high gamma power in the two areas around feedback; however, correlations were observed in both exploration and repetition. In contrast, postfeedback beta (10 - 20 Hz) power in ACC and LPFC correlated more frequently during repetition. Together, our data suggest that the coordination between ACC and LPFC activity is expressed during adaptive as well as stable behavioral periods but with different modes depending on the behavioral period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据