4.7 Article

NMDA Receptors in Hippocampal GABAergic Synapses and Their Role in Nitric Oxide Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 31, 期 16, 页码 5893-5904

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5938-10.2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55005608]
  2. European Union [LSHM-CT-2004-005166, LSHM-CT-2006-037315]
  3. Nemzeti Kutatasi es Technologiai Hivatal-Orszagos Tudomanyos Kutatasi Alapprogramok [CNK77793]
  4. National Institutes of Health [DA09158, MH054671, NS030549]
  5. Janos Bolyai Research Fellowship
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21500311, 23390156, 19100005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GABAergic inhibition plays a central role in the control of pyramidal cell ensemble activities; thus, any signaling mechanism that regulates inhibition is able to fine-tune network patterns. Here, we provide evidence that the retrograde nitric oxide (NO)-cGMP cascade triggered by NMDA receptor(NMDAR) activation plays a role in the control of hippocampal GABAergic transmission in mice. GABAergic synapses express neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) postsynaptically and NO receptors (NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase) in the presynaptic terminals. We hypothesized that-similar to glutamatergic synapses-the Ca2+ transients required to activate nNOS were provided by NMDA receptor activation. Indeed, administration of 5 mu M NMDA induced a robust nNOS-dependent cGMP production in GABAergic terminals, selectively in the CA1 and CA3c areas. Furthermore, using preembedding, postembedding, and SDS-digested freeze-fracture replica immunogold labeling, we provided quantitative immunocytochemical evidence that NMDAR subunits GluN1, GluN2A, and GluN2B were present in most somatic GABAergic synapses postsynaptically. These data indicate that NMDARs can modulate hippocampal GABAergic inhibition via NO-cGMP signaling in an activity-dependent manner and that this effect is subregion specific in the mouse hippocampus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据