4.7 Article

Opposite Movement of the External Gate of a Glutamate Transporter Homolog upon Binding Cotransported Sodium Compared with Substrate

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 31, 期 16, 页码 6255-6262

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6096-10.2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Service
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-NS051169, R01-HL095920]
  3. Oregon Opportunity
  4. NIH [5P30CA069533, 5P30EY010572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, a new model for glutamate uptake by glutamate transporters was proposed based on crystal structures of the bacterial glutamate transporter homolog Glt(Ph). It was proposed that hairpin two (HP2) functions as the extracellular gate and that Na(+) and glutamate binding closes HP2, thereby allowing for the translocation of the glutamate binding pocket across the membrane. However, the conformation of HP2 in the apo state and the Na(+) bound state is unknown. We here use double site-directed spin-labeling electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy on the bacterial transporter GltPh from Pyrococcus horikoshi to examine conformational changes in HP2. Surprisingly, the cotransported substrates Na(+) and aspartate induce opposite movements of HP2. We find that in the apo state, HP2 is in a similar conformation as in the aspartate-bound closed state. Na(+) binding to the apo state opens HP2, whereas the subsequent binding of aspartate closes HP2. Our findings show that Na(+) binding opens and stabilizes the extracellular gate, thereby allowing for amino acid substrate binding. In contrast, in the absence of Na(+) and aspartate, HP2 closes, suggesting a potential mechanism for the translocation of the empty binding pocket necessary to complete the transport cycle. The finding that physiological Na(+) concentrations stabilize the open HP2 state would ensure that the outward-facing conformation of the transporter is maintained in physiological solutions and that glutamate transporters are ready to quickly bind glutamate released from glutamatergic synapses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据