4.7 Article

Genetic Deletion of Cdc42 Reveals a Crucial Role for Astrocyte Recruitment to the Injury Site In Vitro and In Vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 31, 期 35, 页码 12471-12482

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2696-11.2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG ) [G0 640/7-1, 8-1, 9-1, SPP-1048]
  2. excellence cluster Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich
  3. European Community [LSHG-CT-2007-037445]
  4. SFB 596 and 870
  5. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [01GN0503, FKZ: 01 GN 0820]
  6. Helmholtz Association in the framework of the Helmholtz Alliance for Mental Health in Ageing Society (HELMA)
  7. Helmholtz Association [HA-215]
  8. Virtual Institute for Neurodegeneration Ageing [VH-VI-252]
  9. Bavarian research network ForNeuroCell
  10. Graduate School of Systemic Neuroscience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is generally suggested that astrocytes play important restorative functions after brain injury, yet little is known regarding their recruitment to sites of injury, despite numerous in vitro experiments investigating astrocyte polarity. Here, we genetically manipulated one of the proposed key signals, the small RhoGTPase Cdc42, selectively in mouse astrocytes in vitro and in vivo. We used an in vitro scratch assay as a minimal wounding model and found that astrocytes lacking Cdc42 (Cdc42 Delta) were still able to form protrusions, although in a nonoriented way. Consequently, they failed to migrate in a directed manner toward the scratch. When animals were injured in vivo through a stab wound, Cdc42 Delta astrocytes developed protrusions properly oriented toward the lesion, but the number of astrocytes recruited to the lesion site was significantly reduced. Surprisingly, however, lesions in Cdc42 Delta animals, harboring fewer astrocytes contained significantly higher numbers of microglial cells than controls. These data suggest that impaired recruitment of astrocytes to sites of injury has a profound and unexpected effect on microglia recruitment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据