4.7 Article

Projection-Specific Neuromodulation of Medial Prefrontal Cortex Neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 50, 页码 16922-16937

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-10.2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH048432]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mnemonic persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) constitutes the neural basis of working memory. To understand how neuro-modulators contribute to the generation of persistent activity, it is necessary to identify the intrinsic properties of the layer V pyramidal neurons that transfer this information to downstream networks. Here we show that the somatic dynamic and integrative properties of layer V pyramidal neurons in the rat medial PFC depend on whether they project subcortically to the pons [corticopontine (CPn)] or to the contralateral cortex [commissural (COM)]. CPn neurons display low temporal summation and accelerate in firing frequency when depolarized, whereas COM neurons have high temporal summation and display spike frequency accommodation. In response to dynamic stimuli, COM neurons act as low-pass filters, whereas CPn neurons act as bandpass filters, resonating in the theta frequency range (3-6 Hz). The disparate subthreshold properties of COM and CPn neurons can be accounted for by differences in the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide gated cation h-current. Interestingly, neuromodulators hypothesized to enhance mnemonic persistent activity affect COM and CPn neurons distinctly. Adrenergic modulation shifts the dynamic properties of CPn but not COM neurons and increases the excitability of CPn neurons significantly more than COM neurons. In response to cholinergic modulation, CPn neurons were much more likely to display activity-dependent intrinsic persistent firing than COM neurons. Together, these data suggest that the two categories of projection neurons may subserve separate functions in PFC and may be engaged differently during working memory processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据