4.7 Article

Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 34, 页码 11476-11485

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5252-09.2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS034994, NSF 0613414]
  2. James M. McDonnell Foundation
  3. Pew Charitable Trust
  4. Mathers Foundation
  5. Gimbel Fund
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-2008-000-10008-0]
  8. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2008-000-10008-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Low intensity electric fields have been suggested to affect the ongoing neuronal activity in vitro and in human studies. However, the physiological mechanism of how weak electrical fields affect and interact with intact brain activity is not well understood. We performed in vivo extracellular and intracellular recordings from the neocortex and hippocampus of anesthetized rats and extracellular recordings in behaving rats. Electric fields were generated by sinusoid patterns at slow frequency (0.8, 1.25 or 1.7 Hz) via electrodes placed on the surface of the skull or the dura. Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) reliably entrained neurons in widespread cortical areas, including the hippocampus. The percentage of TES phase-locked neurons increased with stimulus intensity and depended on the behavioral state of the animal. TES-induced voltage gradient, as low as 1 mV/mm at the recording sites, was sufficient to phase-bias neuronal spiking. Intracellular recordings showed that both spiking and subthreshold activity were under the combined influence of TES forced fields and network activity. We suggest that TES in chronic preparations may be used for experimental and therapeutic control of brain activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据