4.7 Article

The α-Syntrophin PH and PDZ Domains Scaffold Acetylcholine Receptors, Utrophin, and Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase at the Neuromuscular Junction

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 33, 页码 11004-11010

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1930-10.2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS33145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), the dystrophin protein complex provides a scaffold that functions to stabilize acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters. Syntrophin, a key component of that scaffold, is a multidomain adapter protein that links a variety of signaling proteins and ion channels to the dystrophin protein complex. Without syntrophin, utrophin and neuronal nitric oxide synthase mu (nNOS mu) fail to localize to the NMJ and the AChRs are distributed abnormally. Here we investigate the contribution of syntrophin domains to AChR distribution and to localization of utrophin and nNOS mu at the NMJ. Transgenic mice expressing alpha-syntrophin lacking portions of the first pleckstrin homology(PH) domain (Delta PH1a or Delta PH1b) or the entire PDZ domain (Delta PDZ) were bred onto the alpha-syntrophin null background. As expected the Delta PDZ transgene did not restore the NMJ localization of nNOS. The Delta PH1a transgene did restore postsynaptic nNOS but surprisingly did not restore sarcolemmal nNOS (although sarcolemmal aquaporin-4 was restored). Mice lacking the alpha-syntrophin PDZ domain or either half of the PH1 domain were able to restore utrophin to the NMJ but did not correct the aberrant AChR distribution of the alpha-syntrophin knock-out mice. However, mice expressing both the transgenic Delta PDZ and the transgenic Delta PH1a constructs did restore normal AChR distribution, demonstrating that both domains are required but need not be confined within the same protein to function. We conclude that the PH1 and PDZ domains of alpha-syntrophin work in concert to facilitate the localization of AChRs and nNOS at the NMJ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据