4.7 Article

Neural Correlates of Auditory Scene Analysis Based on Inharmonicity in Monkey Primary Auditory Cortex

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 37, 页码 12480-12494

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1780-10.2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DC00657]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Segregation of concurrent sounds in complex acoustic environments is a fundamental feature of auditory scene analysis. A powerful cue used by the auditory system to segregate concurrent sounds, such as speakers' voices at a cocktail party, is inharmonicity. This can be demonstrated when a component of a harmonic complex tone is perceived as a separate tone popping out from the complex as a whole when it is sufficiently mistuned from its harmonic value. The neural bases of perceptual pop out of mistuned harmonics are unclear. We recorded multiunit activity from primary auditory cortex (A1) of behaving monkeys elicited by harmonic complex tones that were either in tune or that contained a mistuned third harmonic set at the best frequency of the neural populations. Responses to mistuned sounds were enhanced relative to responses to in- tune sounds, thus correlating with the enhanced perceptual salience of the mistuned component. Consistent with human psychophysics of pop out, response enhancements increased with the degree of mistuning, were maximal for neural populations tuned to the frequency of the mistuned component, and were not observed under comparable stimulus conditions that do not elicit perceptual pop out. Mistuning was also associated with changes in neuronal temporal response patterns phase locked to beats in the stimuli. Intracortical auditory evoked potentials paralleled noninvasive neurophysiological correlates of perceptual pop out in humans, further augmenting the translational relevance of the results. Findings suggest two complementary neural mechanisms for pop out, based on the detection of local differences in activation level or coherence of temporal response patterns across A1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据