4.7 Article

High-Frequency Network Activity, Global Increase in Neuronal Activity, and Synchrony Expansion Precede Epileptic Seizures In Vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 16, 页码 5690-5701

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0535-10.2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Epilepsy Research UK [A0702, A0937]
  2. Wellcome Trust [074771]
  3. Institutional Research Plan [AV0Z10300504]
  4. MRC [G0301020, MC_U138197111] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Epilepsy Research UK [F0806] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_U138197111, G0301020] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How seizures start is a major question in epilepsy research. Preictal EEG changes occur in both human patients and animal models, but their underlying mechanisms and relationship with seizure initiation remain unknown. Here we demonstrate the existence, in the hippocampal CA1 region, of a preictal state characterized by the progressive and global increase in neuronal activity associated with a widespread buildup of low-amplitude high-frequency activity (HFA) (> 100 Hz) and reduction in system complexity. HFA is generated by the firing of neurons, mainly pyramidal cells, at much lower frequencies. Individual cycles of HFA are generated by the near-synchronous (within similar to 5 ms) firing of small numbers of pyramidal cells. The presence of HFA in the low-calcium model implicates nonsynaptic synchronization; the presence of very similar HFA in the high-potassium model shows that it does not depend on an absence of synaptic transmission. Immediately before seizure onset, CA1 is in a state of high sensitivity in which weak depolarizing or synchronizing perturbations can trigger seizures. Transition to seizure is characterized by a rapid expansion and fusion of the neuronal populations responsible for HFA, associated with a progressive slowing of HFA, leading to a single, massive, hypersynchronous cluster generating the high-amplitude low-frequency activity of the seizure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据