4.7 Article

The Role of the Primary Visual Cortex in Perceptual Suppression of Salient Visual Stimuli

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 30, 期 37, 页码 12353-12365

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0677-10.2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. National Eye Institute-National Institutes of Health [R01 EY018847]
  3. U.S. Department of Defense [W81XWH-08-2-0147]
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs
  5. Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of primary visual cortex (area V1) in subjective perception has intrigued students of vision for decades. Specifically, the extent to which the activity of different types of cells (monocular versus binocular) and electrophysiological signals (i.e., local field potentials versus spiking activity) reflect perception is still debated. To address these questions we recorded from area V1 of the macaque using tetrodes during the paradigm of binocular flash suppression, where incongruent images presented dichoptically compete for perceptual dominance. We found that the activity of a minority (20%) of neurons reflect the perceived visual stimulus and these cells exhibited perceptual modulations substantially weaker compared with their sensory modulation induced by congruent stimuli. Importantly, perceptual modulations were found equally often for monocular and binocular cells, demonstrating that perceptual competition in V1 involves mechanisms across both types of neurons. The power of the local field potential (LFP) also showed moderate perceptual modulations with similar percentages of sites showing significant effects across frequency bands (18-22%). The possibility remains that perception may be strongly reflected in more elaborate aspects of activity in V1 circuits (e.g., specific neuronal subtypes) or perceptual states might have a modulatory role on more intricate aspects of V1 firing patterns (e.g., synchronization), not necessarily altering the firing rates of single cells or the LFP power dramatically.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据