4.7 Article

Endogenous κ Opioid Activation Mediates Stress-Induced Deficits in Learning and Memory

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 4293-4300

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6146-08.2009

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse [R03 DA16415]
  2. Northeastern University Provost Research and Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We hypothesized that mice subjected to prolonged stress would demonstrate decreased performance in a learning and memory task attributable to the endogenous activation of the kappa opioid receptor (KOR). C57BL/6J mice were tested using the novel object recognition (NOR) assay at various time points after exposure to repeated forced swim stress (FSS). Unstressed mice demonstrated recognition of the novel object at the end of a procedure using three 10-min object interaction phases, with a recognition index (RI) for the novel object of 71.7 +/- 3.4%. However, 1 h after exposure to FSS, vehicle-pretreated mice displayed a significant deficit in performance (RI = 58.2 +/- 4.1%) compared with unstressed animals. NOR was still significantly reduced 4 but not 24 h after FSS. Treatment with the KOR-selective antagonist norbinaltorphimine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) prevented the decline in learning and memory performance. Moreover, direct activation of the KOR induced performance deficits in NOR, as exogenous administration of the KOR agonist U50,488 [(+/-)-trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]-benzeneacetamide] (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) suppressed NOR (RI = 56.0 +/- 3.9%). The effect of FSS on NOR performance was further examined in mice lacking the gene for the endogenous KOR agonist dynorphin (Dyn). Dyn gene-disrupted mice exposed to FSS did not show the subsequent learning and memory deficits (RI = 66.8 +/- 3.8%) demonstrated by their wild-type littermates (RI = 49.7 +/- 2.9%). Overall, these results suggest that stress-induced activation of the KOR may be both necessary and sufficient to produce subsequent deficits in novel object recognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据