4.7 Article

Functional and Morphological Differences among Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 476-482

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4117-08.2009

关键词

intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cell; circadian entrainment; melanopsin; patch clamp; retina; dendritic arborization; dendrite

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EY012949, R21-EY018885, T32 EY0707133]
  2. University of Minnesota Graduate School
  3. McKnight Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A subset of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina express the photopigment melanopsin and are intrinsically photosensitive (ipRGCs). These cells are implicated in non-image-forming visual responses to environmental light, such as the pupillary light reflex, seasonal adaptations in physiology, photic inhibition of nocturnal melatonin release, and modulation of sleep, alertness, and activity. Morphological studies have confirmed the existence of at least three distinct subpopulations of ipRGCs, but studies of the physiology of ipRGCs at the single cell level have focused mainly on M1 cells, the dendrites of which stratify solely in sublamina a (OFF sublamina) of the retinal inner plexiform layer (IPL). Little work has been done to compare the functional properties of M1 cells to those of M2 cells, the dendrites of which stratify solely in sublamina b (ON sublamina) of the IPL. The goal of the current study was to compare the morphology, intrinsic light response, and intrinsic membrane properties of M1 and M2 cells in the mouse retina. Here we demonstrate additional morphological differences between M1 and M2 cells as well as distinct physiological characteristics of both the intrinsic light responses and intrinsic membrane properties. M2 cells displayed a more complex dendritic arborization and higher input resistance, yet showed lower light sensitivity and lower maximal light responses than M1 cells. These data indicate morphological and functional heterogeneity among ipRGCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据