4.3 Article

Unconventional superconductivity in Sr2RuO4

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.039

关键词

Unconventional superconductivity; Spin-triplet superconductivity; Correlated electrons

资金

  1. DOE [DE-FG02-04ER46159]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012CB927403]
  3. NSF [DMR-1205469]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-04ER46159] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1205469] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sr2RuO4, featuring a layered perovskite crystalline and quasi-two-dimensional electronic structure, was first synthesized in 1959. Unconventional, p-wave pairing was predicted for Sr2RuO4 by Rice and Sigrist and Baskaran shortly after superconductivity in this material was discovered in 1994. Experimental evidence for unconventional superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 has been accumulating in the past two decades and reviewed previously. In this article, we will first discuss constraints on the pairing symmetry of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 and summarize experimental evidence supporting the unconventional pairing symmetry in this material. We will then present several aspects of the experimental determination of the unconventional superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 in some detail. In particular, we will discuss the phase-sensitive measurements that have played an important role in the determination of the pairing symmetry in Sr2RuO4. The responses of superconductivity to the mechanical perturbations and their implications on the mechanism of superconductivity will be discussed. A brief survey of various non-bulk Sr2RuO4 will also be included to illustrate the many unusual features resulted from the unconventional nature of superconductivity in this material system. Finally, we will discuss some outstanding unresolved issues on Sr2RuO4 and provide an outlook of the future work on Sr2RuO4. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据