4.7 Article

The Neuropeptide Pigment-Dispersing Factor Adjusts Period and Phase of Drosophila's Clock

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 2597-2610

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5439-08.2009

关键词

pigment-dispersing factor; period; timeless; internal desynchronization; circadian rhythms; neuropeptide

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungs Gemeinschaft [Fo207/9-1,2, Sta421/4, Sta421/5]
  2. Graduate College [640]
  3. EUCLOCK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) is a key transmitter in the circadian clock of Drosophila melanogaster. PDF is necessary for robust activity rhythms and is thought to couple the circadian oscillations of the clock neurons. However, little is known about the action of PDF on individual clock neurons. Here, we combined the period-luciferase reporter system with immunolabeling of clock proteins in wild-type and Pdf(01) mutants to dissect the effects of PDF on specific subgroups of clock neurons. Additionally, PDF levels were elevated to higher than normal levels using specific neural mutants, and a correlation analysis of locomotor activity and clock protein staining served to determine the periods of specific clock cells. We found that PDF has multiple effects on the clock neurons: In some groups of clock neurons, PDF was required for maintaining the oscillations of individual cells, and in others, PDF was required for synchronous cycling of the individual members. Other clock neurons cycled with high amplitude in absence of PDF, but PDF affected their intrinsic clock speed. Sometimes PDF shortened and sometimes PDF lengthened period. Our observations indicate that PDF is crucial for adjusting cycling amplitude, period, and phase of the different players in the circadian clock. Under natural conditions PDF may be required for adapting Drosophila's clock to varying photoperiods. Indeed, we show here that Pdf(01) mutants are not able to adapt their activity to long photoperiods in a wild-type manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据