4.7 Article

Black Responses Dominate Macaque Primary Visual Cortex V1

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 38, 页码 11753-11760

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1991-09.2009

关键词

-

资金

  1. U. S. National Institutes of Health [EY-001472]
  2. U. S. National Science Foundation [NSF-0745253]
  3. Robert Leet and Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust
  4. Swartz Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Achromatic visual information is transferred from the retina to the brain through two parallel channels: ON-center cells carry white information and OFF-center cells black information (Nelson et al., 1978; Schiller, 1982; Schiller et al., 1986). Responses of ON and OFF retinal and thalamic neurons are approximately equal in magnitude (Kruger and Fischer, 1975; Kremers et al., 1993), but psychophysical studies have shown that humans detect light decrements ( black) better and faster than increments ( white) (Blackwell, 1946; Short, 1966; Krauskopf, 1980; Whittle, 1986; Bowen et al., 1989; Chan and Tyler, 1992; Kontsevich and Tyler, 1999; Chubb and Nam, 2000; Dannemiller and Stephens, 2001). From recordings of single-cell activity in the macaque monkey's primary visual cortex (V1), we found that black-dominant neurons substantially outnumbered white-dominant neurons in the corticocortical output layers 2/3, but the numbers of black- and white-dominant neurons were nearly equal in the thalamocortical input layer 4c. These results strongly suggest that the black-over-white preference is generated or greatly amplified in V1. The predominance of OFF neurons in layers 2/3 of V1, which provide visual input to higher cortical areas, may explain why human subjects detect black more easily than white. Furthermore, our results agree with human EEG and fMRI findings that V1 responses to decrements are stronger than to increments, though the OFF/ON imbalance we found in layers 2/3 of macaque V1 is much larger than in the whole V1 population in the human V1 experiments (Zemon et al., 1988, 1995; Olman et al., 2008).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据