4.7 Article

Selective Aspiration or Neurotoxic Lesions of Orbital Frontal Areas 11 and 13 Spared Monkeys' Performance on the Object Discrimination Reversal Task

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 9, 页码 2794-2804

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4655-08.2009

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH-58846]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD-35471]
  3. Autism Speaks Mentor-Based Predoctoral Fellowship
  4. Yerkes Base [NIH RR00165]
  5. Center for Behavioral Neuroscience [IBN-9876754]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage to the orbital frontal cortex (OFC) has long been associated with reversal learning deficits in several species. In monkeys, this impairment follows lesions that include several OFC subfields. However, the different connectional patterns of OFC subfields together with neuroimaging data in humans have suggested that specific OFC areas play distinctive roles in processing information necessary to guide behavior (Kringelbach and Rolls, 2004; Barbas, 2007; Price, 2007). More specifically, areas 11 and 13 contribute to a sensory network, whereas medial areas 10, 14, and 25 are heavily connected to a visceromotor network. To examine the contribution of areas 11 and 13 to reversal learning, we tested monkeys with selective damage to these two OFC areas on two versions of the ODR task using either one or five discrimination problems. We compared their performance with that of sham-operated controls and of animals with neurotoxic amygdala lesions, which served as operated controls. Neither damage to areas 11 and 13 nor damage to the amygdala affected performance on theODRtasks. The results indicate that areas 11 and 13 do not critically contribute to reversal learning and that adjacent damage to OFC subfields (10, 12, 14, and 25) could account for the ODR deficits found in earlier lesion studies. This sparing of reversal learning will be discussed in relation to deficits found in the same animals on tasks that measure behavioral modulation when relative value of affective (positive and negative) stimuli was manipulated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据