4.7 Article

Bistability and Non-Gaussian Fluctuations in Spontaneous Cortical Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 29, 期 26, 页码 8512-8524

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0754-09.2009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP0667065, TS0669860]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education
  3. Research (Berlin Neuroimaging Center
  4. Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Bernstein Focus State Dependencies of Learning)
  5. Robert Bosch Foundation
  6. Brain Network Recovery Group [JSMF22002082]
  7. Australian Research Council [DP0667065, TS0669860] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The brain is widely assumed to be a paradigmatic example of a complex, self-organizing system. As such, it should exhibit the classic hallmarks of nonlinearity, multistability, and nondiffusivity (large coherent fluctuations). Surprisingly, at least at the very large scale of neocortical dynamics, there is little empirical evidence to support this, and hence most computational and methodological frameworks for healthy brain activity have proceeded very reasonably from a purely linear and diffusive perspective. By studying the temporal fluctuations of power in human resting-state electroencephalograms, we show that, although these simple properties may hold true at some temporal scales, there is strong evidence for bistability and nondiffusivity in key brain rhythms. Bistability is manifest as nonclassic bursting between high-and low-amplitude modes in the alpha rhythm. Nondiffusivity is expressed through the irregular appearance of high amplitude extremal events in beta rhythm power fluctuations. The statistical robustness of these observations was confirmed through comparison with Gaussian-rendered phase-randomized surrogate data. Although there is a good conceptual framework for understanding bistability in cortical dynamics, the implications of the extremal events challenge existing frameworks for understanding large-scale brain systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据